
Remote Patient Management for ALL Peritoneal Dialysis Patients
39%
54%
77%
* A retrospective cohort study including 360 patients with a mean age of 57 years (diabetes 42.5%) initiating APD between 1 October 2016 and 30 June 2017 in 28 Vantive Renal Care Services (BRCS) units in Columbia.
Vantive and Sharesource are trademarks of Vantive Health LLC or its affiliates.
References
-
Walker RC, Tong A, Howard K, Darby N, Palmer SC. Patients' and caregivers' expectations and experiences of remote monitoring for peritoneal dialysis: A qualitative interview study. Perit Dial Int. 2020;40(6):540-547.
-
Milan Manani S, Rosner MH, Virzi GM, et al. Longitudinal Experience with Remote Monitoring for Automated Peritoneal Dialysis Patients. Nephron. 2019;142(1):1-9.
-
Wallace EL, et al. Remote patient management for home dialysis patients. Kidney Int Rep. 2017;2:1009-1017.
-
Sanabria M, Buitrago G, Lindholm B, et al. Remote Patient Monitoring Program in Automated Peritoneal Dialysis: Impact on Hospitalizations. Perit Dial Int. 2019;39(5):472-478.
-
Firanek C. et al. Discrepancy between prescribed and actual APD prescription delivery: Identification using cycler remote management technology. EDTA 5-18-2017. Poster #MP557.
-
Sanabria M, Rosner M, Vesga J, et al. A remote management program in automated peritoneal dialysis patients in Columbia. Nefrologica Latinoamericana. 2018;15:47-51.
-
Centellas-Perez FJ, Ortega-Cerrato A, Vera M, et al. Impact of Remote Monitoring on Standardized Outcomes in Nephrology - Peritoneal Dialysis. Kidney International Reports.2024;9:266-276.
-
Wood E, McCarthy K, Knowles MR. Remote monitoring of peritoneal dialysis: evaluating the impact of the Claria Sharesource system. J Kidney Care. 2019;4(1):2-9.
-
Chaudhuri S, Han H, Muchiutti C, et al. Remote Treatment Monitoring on Hospitalization and Technique Failure Rates in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients. Kidney360. 2020.